Why now finding it so difficult to get the proper purpose and agreed upon a combination? Part of the difficulty stems from the fact that we are talking about a huge arc of disabilities and difficulties that prepare them and know them.
What do we mean when we talk about integration? After all, people with disabilities are not monolithic and there is no one simple way to integrate all set to all kinds of social activities. All disability brings its own challenges, and requires a special combination and optimized. How is it possible, then, to speak of integration as a single and rigid concept?
In some ways the combination is indeed a target complex and multifaceted, but this is an unequivocal reading direction the company has taken on. When the company defines, for example, that children who have any kind of disability are entitled to integrate into the regular school system – this means that each case must be treated individually tailored. The assumption underlying the idea of integration is a pluralistic democratic society committed to the deepest way to integrate all types of populations and avoid at all costs the exclusion.
The Equal Rights defines a person with a disability in the following way: “a person with a physical, mental or intellectual, including cognitive, permanent or temporary, due to which functioning substantially limited in one or more main spheres of life.” Acceptable to talk about two standard deviations from the mean to talk about disability – that is, the most simplistic way possible to explain that people with disabilities are just people who deviate from the norm considerably. There are many ways to describe disabilities, and one way is to divide them accepted four key areas:
Sensory disabilities – particularly hearing and vision disabilities.
Physical disabilities – that is, all types of motor activity disorders such as using a wheelchair or crutches, and including epilepsy and respiratory disorders.
Mental disabilities – on the scale of this expansion set all areas of mental disorders.
Cognitive disabilities – all kinds of difficulties in mental development. This too is a broad definition which belong to their mentally retarded people, people with autism and people with learning difficulties such as dyslexia or attention deficit disorder.
These definitions are more inclusive, especially when you consider the enormous bow of the cases they are trying to describe. For example, when talking about people with autism: under one simple word, we meet a wide range of disabilities: classic autism, Asperger syndrome, Rett syndrome, pervasive developmental disorder not associated with childhood disorders and integrative enough. Even within each sub-category of this kind will encounter more severe cases and less, and varying levels of functionality.
The review above illustrates the difficulty exists, and the integration domain case is so complex domain. This is a very broad spectrum of disabilities and impairments and integration of all kinds of people with all types of disabilities inevitably puts a challenge to the public. Yet, understanding that there are many types of disorders that in turn leads to the recognition of the possible contribution of special populations and diverse people so far have been excluded in many cases from society at large. The combination is a necessary step on our path to a just, useful and contain.